dinsdag 10 december 2013


 Paul McCartney died and an impostor took his place

Or at least that's what a conspiracy theory popular among Beatles and music fans in general says.
Now, with the 50th annyversary of the publication of the Beatles first record I thought it would be nice to make an article about it. With the annyversary, McCartney, who is already filthy rich, will become even richer, or at least the impostor who occupies his place will.
This theory is quite confusing and there are different versions of it.

The real Paul McCartney in 1964

According to the main theory, on November 9th, 1966, Paul McCartney walked out of a studio where he and the rest of The Beatles were recording for Sgt. Peppers album. He just had an argument with John Lennon. He stepped into his car and he drove away. His friends would never see him alive again.
But look good at the date, 11/9. Just like 9/11 but the other way around. Could McCartney have been murdered by the Illuminati for some reason? Did he discover that he and his friends were being used to spread the Satanic message among the youth and he was planning to talk or to leave The Beatles? I fear that we'll never know. But let's go back to the facts. After Paul drove away in his car, he crashed into a
When the authorities realized that the man in the car was McCartney they took swift measures.
They got John, Ringo and George and they showed them Paul's body. In the accident, he lost his head and the head itself was missing an eye.
 Once they were at the morgue and they recognized Paul's body, they were told by the secret services not to tell anything about Paul's dead. The British government did not want to lose the export revenues from The Beatles's records. They were scared about social unrest and they were pressured by their Illuminati masters who  didn't want to lose The Beatles as a platform to spread their Luciferian ideas among the youth. The idea was to replace McCartney by an impostor. Some go even further, and they propose that all The Beatles were murdered and replaced by doubles. The chosen man for the job was William Campbell aka Billy Shears, the winner of a Paul McCartney lookalike contest. The other three Beatles were threatened with death if they said something. To make Shears look more like McCartney he was subjected to different rounds of plastic surgery. The Three remaining real Beatles called him Faul, false or fake Paul.

On the left you can see the real Paul McCartney. On the right, Faul. You can see that Faul has a longer face, a longer nose, and his mouth is larger. You can also see that his eyes aren't so round as Paul's. This photo is of 1967. Nowadays Faul looks more like Paul, after being subjected to many operations of plastic surgery.

Ringo, George and John were threatened with death if they would ever tell anything about Paul's death. But in spite of that, they left many clues in their albums, that's how the story ended leaking out.
I won't name all the clues because there are hundreds of them, but I'll name the most important ones. If you want to see more clues you can go to this website: http://web.archive.org/web/20091125201352/http://homepages.tesco.net/harbfamily/opd/index.html 
The story came out in September of 1969, when the newspaper of the University of Drake published an article called "Is Beatle Paul McCartney dead?". One of the clues that the article described was that when the song Revolution 9 of the album White Album is played backwards you can hear "turn me on dead man". They are many other clues left in songs being played backwards. When you play a vinyl record backwards you damage it much quicker than if you play it forwards. That's why some people suggested that the all affair  was a conspiracy of  the record industry to sell more albums. 

In October, the rumor continued to spread after a guy called Tom told radio-station WKNR-FM about the conspiracy and its clues. Around a week later a disc jockey named Roby Yonge  talked about the PID conspiracy at WABC radio, a station heard in most of the US and even other countries. After an hour he was mysteriously pulled off the air. Was he telling something they did not want him to tell?
One of the most famous clues is the cover of the album Abbey Road, where you can see The Beatles walking in a funeral procession. Lennon dressed in the white like a preacher or an angel. Ringo dressed in black because he's mourning for Paul. Harrison dressed in blue like a worker representing a grave-digger. And Faul walks barefoot because he's dead, so he no longer needs shoes.

Abbey Road cover

Another legendary clue is the drum that appears on the cover of the Sargent Peppers album. If you put it against a mirror you'll read 1 1 9 he die (November 9th he died).

Also some speculate that John Lennon was murdered in 1980 by the FBI or the CIA because he was planning to tell the truth about Paul's death. Even Lennon's son thinks this. It's also believed that Yoko Ono was an MI6 agent. Curiously, around twenty years later somebody tried to kill George Harrison.
OK, that's all for now. I'll be back soon with another fascinating conspiracy. See you later alligator! 

vrijdag 6 december 2013


Was the arrest of Adolf Eichmann a distraction maneuver?

Adolf Eichmann

According to German journalist Gaby Weber, Adolf Eichmann wasn't kidnapped on May 11th 1960. Actually, the Mossad, the CIA, and the BND(the West-German intelligence service) knew about his whereabouts since the end of the war. Which raises the question: why they did not catch him before? Was Eichmann maybe a double agent? Was he informing about other Nazis in South America? And if that's true, was he then collaborating with Western intelligence services already before the end of the war? Was he then a traitor to the Third Reich?

 On May 22nd 1960 there was an earthquake in Valdivia(Chile). It was the most powerful earthquake ever, and it caused the death of approximately 6000 people. You would think that this event has nothing to do with Eichmann's arrest. But Weber learned from declassified BND files that the earthquake was provoked by US nuclear test in the Argentinian Patagonia.

Buildings damaged in the Valdivia earthquake(1960)

After being kidnapped, Adolf Eichmann was held prisoner in a secret location in Argentina. He was brought to Israel on May 22nd, the same day than the earthquake. Weber thinks that the two events were made intentionally to coincide; so that the day after Eichmann would be on the front page of every newspaper and not the earthquake. Weber was thrown out of the USA when she was investigating  this subject, which may prove that she is right. 
That's all folks!!

zondag 1 december 2013


Confusion in the Truth Movement

The Truth and Conspiracy Movement, just like any other human institution is infiltrated by the Illuminati. Some of the most famous conspiracy authors are rumored of being agents of the darkest forces in this world. We, the honest followers that read, listen and view their materials is little that we can do about it. They mix real information with disinformation. Sometimes they will even present "evidence" for this disinformation. It has been rumored for a long time that Alex Jones is a Zionist agent and that he is financed by the Koch brothers. That David Icke is an Illuminati agent or at least he is used by them to present crazy, bizarre and unbelievable theories to discredit the conspiracy theories which are totally true and very easy to prove. That Jordan Maxwell and Michael Tsarion are Satanists, and we could go on and on and on.


From top to bottom: Alex Jones, David Icke, Michael Tsarion and Jordan Maxwell

The accusations above may or may not be true. It's difficult to know. I promise that I'll investigate deeper into those men and I'll make another article about it. There is little we can do stop the Illuminati spreading misinformation. The only thing we can do is check out everything and not believe everything they tell us. 
But an even bigger problem is how the millions of bloggers and internet film-makers around the world let filtrate their religious and political ideas to the material they publish often with little regard for the truth.
For example, somebody who has been educated as a Protestant will say that the Vatican is behind the Illuminati, when the Catholic Church isn't more or less infiltrated by the Illuminati than any other institution. Actually all the churches are infiltrated by them. Especially troubling is the way some christian Zionists who call themselves "truthers" are defending Israel without ever caring to look to Israel's crimes against humanity and their more than clear ties with the New World Order.
We, all the truthers, all the conspiracy theorists who are against the NWO, should forget about our differences and use all our forces to fight against the NWO. to unveil the truth without having any holy cow, no matter how ugly this truth may be for us. That's what we, all truthers should do and I for sure will do, from this blog. Greetings.

woensdag 27 november 2013


The police sketches seem to prove it.

The two pictures above are artist impressions of the two people seen by Dutch shop assistant Anna Stam in Amsterdam in 2007, in company of a girl that looked like Maddie.

And now look good at the photo above, they are the McCanns, and compare it with the two sketches above. Do they look like each other or not?
It has been  suspected for a long time already that the McCanns were involved in the disapparition of their daughter. From the first moment the Portuguese police suspected that they were involved in it. And although Maddie's mother, Kate McCann told the press that she and her husband wouldn't leave Portugal until her daughter was found, when the police increased the pressure on her and her husband they fled to England to avoid being imprisoned. In the begin, Kate presented herself to the press as a devout catholic mother who was heartbroken by the disapparition of her daughter, and she and her husband got a lot of sympathy, in Portugal, in England and all around the world. But as the police investigation progressed the police discovered things that didn't fit in the picture she sold to the press. Blood of Maddie was found in a car rented by the McCanns, and to make it worse Kate and Gerry McCann appeared in the media criticizing the Portuguese police and Portugal as a country. And although most of the British public opinion continued to unconditionally support the McCanns, in Portugal people was every day more hostile to them. And to make it even worse the police discovered that they were active in the swinger milieu, which does not fit into the picture of devout catholic that Kate sold to the press. And which also leads oneself to ask: is Gerry McCann really the father of Maddie? Or some idiot Kate fucked in a swinger party? Did Gerry want to sell her because she wasn't his daughter? Did Kate maybe agree to get more money for their secret vices?
In conspiracy circles it is believed that the McCanns sold their daughter to the president of the European Commission Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, to be used as his own sexual slave. And now I want to show you  something more. 

Of the two pictures here above, the first one is of Durao Barroso, the sketch you can see under his photo was released by the British police as the sketch of a suspect seen around the apartment of the McCanns around the time Maddie disappeared. The two faces are quite similar, same nose, similar eyes and mouth. The description of the man's body given by witnesses to the police also fitted Durao Barroso. If the rumors that appeared on internet would have been about somebody without the position of Durao Barroso, this person would have been arrested already long ago.

As in the Holloway case, Maddie's parents have become celebrities and they profited immensely from the disapparition of their daughter, plus what they may have gotten from Durao Barroso. And as in the Holloway case, in the end, the only one that loses is the disappeared girl. Again a little defenseless child has fallen in the dirty claws of the sick people that are at the top of our sick society , to be used in their sick rituals and vices.
Even if she is still alive and she could escape and publicly accuse Barroso, he would never be arrested, and nobody would complain about it. So idiotic has the sheeple become. But OK, let's stop talking about these things because otherwise I'll end up vomiting. I hope you are all OK and I'll be back very soon to shed some more light on the dark side of our society. See you!

dinsdag 26 november 2013


As I told you already in my last post; the Holloway case was a big cover-up and an insult to the Aruban people. Now I will explain you the second part of this conspiracy.
On Juni 2nd 2010 Stephany Flores was found dead in an hotel room in Lima. She was lying dead there for already three days. Since May 30th, exactly 5 years after Natalee Holloway disappeared. Stephany was seen the night before in a casino together with Joran van der Sloot.

Stephany Flores

Nothing was known about Joran van der Sloot since May 30th. So it wasn't long before everybody was pointing the finger at him. I already explained in the first part of this story how they tried to frame Joran for the disapparition of Natalee Holloway. In the end, Natalee never appeared, Joran's life was ruined, the case did a big damage on the Aruban economy and the only one that made a profit was Natalee's mother, that earned millions with the sells of her book and her movie. But didn't spend a cent in any private investigation or in anything that could help to find Natalee.

But what was Joran doing in Peru anyway? It turns out that Joran searched contact with Beth Holloway. He offered her information about the location of her daughter's body if he would get the 250.000$ of the reward she was offering. Beth went directly to the feds. The FBI put in place a plan to catch van der Sloot. They gave Beth 25.000$ to give to Joran as an advanced payment, the rest he would get when he would tell her where exactly the body was. The feds wanted to arrest him for extortion, but for that they needed to lure him to a country from where he could be extradited to the US, and they knew that Joran wanted to go to Peru for a poker competition. 
But wait a moment... extortion? It was Beth Holloway in the first place who offered the ransom!! If later it turned out that he didn't know where the body was, that would be fraud, but extortion?!
Anita van der Sloot, Joran's mother, wanted to intern her son in a mental institution to protect him from his often erratic and dangerous behavior. It seems that in the first moment he agreed. But now, with 25.000 bucks in his pocket, he "escaped" to Peru to gamble away his money. He didn't tell anything to his mother, who was shocked when she learned from the media that her son was searched for by the police of half South America. 

Anita van der Sloot

But what Joran didn't know is that he wasn't alone down there. The FBI followed him all the way. 
In Peru Joran gambled(and lost) all his money. But OK, let's go to the point. 
Did Joran van der Sloot kill Stephany Flores? Definitely not. It is true that Van der Sloot was seen together with Stephany in the casino, but when they supposedly entered the hotel Stephany was all the time looking down. The camera didn't catch her face a single moment. Why she didn't want the camera to see her face? And actually, was she Stephany ? It is very strange that the cameras which filmed them, a few days after Stephany died weren't there any more, and they looked very professional for an hotel. Were the cameras set in place by the feds who were following him all the way from Holland? And more important, why was one of the cameras exactly above the door of Joran's room? It looks that Joran was set up again. 
Did Joran really run away after killing Stephany or he just left because he was planning to do so anyway? Or maybe he realized that he had been set up again, he got scared and he escaped? If he really killed Stephany, why he didn't change his clothes in the three days he was "on the run"? When he was finally arrested by the Chilean police, he told them that Stephany was murdered by the Peruvian police. Could it be that he confused the feds who were following him with the Peruvian police and that actually the FBI killed Stephany?
But who was Stephany? Stephany Flores was the daughter of Ricardo Flores, a wealthy Peruvian entrepreneur. She did come out as a lesbian some years before, but her father strongly disapproved her homosexuality. She was also addicted to gambling, and the last months before she died her problems at home made her gamble away thousands of dollars every night. Thus her father had a motive to kill her. She was embarrassing him with her open lesbianism and she was costing him thousands of dollars every night. And if she was a lesbian, why would she go with a guy to an hotel room? Former Stephany's friend Stephanie Jimenez told ABC news from her safe haven of Miami that Stephany Flores would never have done that. Was there a conspiracy between Beth Holloway, The FBI and Ricardo Flores to murder Stephany and set up Joran van der Sloot?

Ricardo Flores

Ricardo Flores is a Peruvian businessman in the spectacle sector. He has lots of contacts in and out of Peru. But the most interesting ones are the ones he has with the dictatorship of Alberto Fujimori, who imposed a reign of terror on Peru during the nineties and enriched himself together with his cronies with drug trafficking meanwhile on the media he would blame the drug problem on the Maoist rebels who fought(and still fight) for the freedom of the indigenous peasants in Peru.
Flores was the organizer of the political rallies of Fujimori's party. He has also ties with Vladimiro Montesinos, head of Fujimori's security services and one of the most sinister characters in Peru.
Flores is also friend of the owner of the Atlantic City casino, the casino where Joran van der Sloot and Stephany Flores were seen together the day she died.
With this kind of connections it would not have been difficult for Ricardo Flores to prepare the murder of his daughter and blame it on Van der Sloot, and more if the FBI also helps him with it.
But we already said that the girl seen on the images may not be Stephany Flores. So then the question arises: where is Stephany Flores? Probably she was ritually sacrificed by her father and his Illuminati cronies. Then, when the cameras were already gone they placed her body in Joran's room. Joran didn't kill anyone, neither Stephany nor the other girl. Knowing the level of corruption in the Peruvian police, the material evidence against van der Sloot could have been easily fabricated.
Beth Holloway was out on getting van der Sloot's head since 2005. For this she had the help of the feds, who were on the pay of her benefactor Joe Mammana. Ricardo Flores wanted to get rid of the daughter who was bringing so much shame on him and maybe make some kind of bizarre ritual with her. They united their forces and in the end they got their way.

Now Joran is serving a sentence of 28 years in the Castro-Castro prison. Last year the Peruvian government approved the extradition of van der Sloot to the US. But first he will have to serve his time in Peru. In the USA he will be judged for extortion and he could get up to ten years in prison. 
Joran still has the hope that they will let him serve part of his time in The Netherlands, from where it would be more difficult for the Americans to get him extradited to the USA. But with the amount of pressure that the Americans are putting on the Peruvian  government that seems very unlikely. His life is ruined. After serving his time in Peru; plus the ten years he'll have to serve in the United States he will be sixty years old. And that if he is not murdered in jail to stop him from telling something he may know about this big conspiracy.

This sad case is just one more example of the horrifying crimes that the Illuminati commit against children and young people for their totally sick pleasures. And of how they use innocent patsies to cover it up. To all this lost youth and to all those innocent men in prisons all around the world should go our prayers. 
Greetings and I'll be with you again in a few days with another fascinating conspiracy. See you soon! 


vrijdag 22 november 2013


A few days ago I was looking at a crime website for one of my investigations. There was a link to an article about the Holloway case. For me this case didn't have much mystery, Joran van der Sloot was guilty and that was about it. But I only knew about the case from the mainstream media.

 Joran van der Sloot

What I found was more than I could bear. What I found was a conspiracy. A conspiracy that goes up to the highest echelons of power. A conspiracy with devastating consequences: two deaths(Paulus van der Sloot and Stephany Flores), one disappeared(Natalee Holloway), an innocent man in prison(Joran van der Sloot) and millions of tax-payer money thrown away.

Natalee Holloway

A conspiracy where the supposed criminals become victims, the victims become the criminals, and in the end, the ones left standing with the bill are the tax-payers.

First let's look at the facts. Natalee Holloway was supposed to be at the hall of the hotel where she was staying at 10:30 am of May 30th 2005. There she was supposed to take a bus to the airport. She was from Clinton AL(USA), and had been for one week on Aruba for a graduation trip. That day she was supposed to go back home, but she didn't show up at the hotel's hall. When her mother Beth Holloway(back the Beth Twitty) hears that she is missing immediately she arranges for a private jet and with seven friends and family members goes to Aruba.

 Beth Holloway

Here start the strange things. Beth Holloway claims that she arrived at Aruba at 10:30 pm, but airport records show that actually she arrived at 19:45. Why would she lie about this? It turns out that the day before Natalee called her mother and told her that she had no intention to go back to the US. That means that Beth Holloway was on her way to Aruba before her daughter was declared missing. But her strange behavior didn't stop there. Once she was already in Aruba, Beth didn't go directly to the police. Instead, she went to the Van der Sloot's family home. Her daughter was last seen in front of the Aruban night club and restaurant Carlos'n'Charlie's in Oranjestad, stepping into a car where three guys were sitting, Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe. 

Once she was there, she asked Joran where her daughter was. When Joran failed in giving her any information about her daughter; she became aggressive and Paulus van der Sloot had to take his son inside the house to protect him.

 Paulus van der Sloot

When Beth Holloway was flying to Aruba she already had with her printed posters to hang around Aruba. But what is really strange is the content of those posters. Those posters weren't saying anything about a disapparition or a kidnapping. It said Natalee please call me! This together with the fact that she didn't go directly to the police, and the fact that Natalee told her mother that she had no intention to go back home means that Beth Holloway knew, or at least thought that Natalee left herself.

 First poster made by Natalee's mother

When it turned out that Natalee was not with Joran, only then did she go to the police. But actually, Beth didn't want the police to investigate the case. She already had her mind made up. She held Joran v/d Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers responsible for the disapparition of her daughter. But did she really think that they were responsible for the kidnapping or the murder of her daughter. Did she know that Natalee left of her own free will and she wanted to let Joran and his friends pay for it? Were she and her husband Jug responsible for the disapparition of Natalee and now they wanted to use the boys as scapegoats?
The second poster she then made was as curious as the first. It said "kidnapped". How did she know that Natalee was kidnapped? Never anyone claimed to have kidnapped her or asked a ransom. Natalee was just missing. She could also have had an accident, have been murdered, or she could have just left. But no! For Beth Holloway Natalee was kidnapped. Did she think that Natalee escaped as she told her she would do and now somebody was hiding her?

 Second poster of Natalee Holloway

As if all that wasn't enough, when Beth in the end did go to the police, she continued behaving even stranger than she was doing already. But she wasn't the only one. When the Aruban police started investigating, immediately the FBI arrived at the island. That's maybe not so strange, since it involved the disapparition of a US citizen and more important, the daughter of a wealthy family. But be patient, in a moment I'll tell you about the bizarre behavior of the feds in Aruba.
From day 1 Beth Holloway and her then husband Jug Twitty interfered with the police investigation. For them, Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers were guilty and any other line of investigation was garbage. When the Aruban Police arrested two security guards Beth Holloway went totally nuts, demanding that they would be released and to continue investigating the Van der Sloot's and the Kalpoe's. It didn't matter to her that those security guards appeared on security tapes talking to Natalee, and that they were rumored to sell drugs to kids in Aruba. Anyway, the security guards turned out to be innocent. 

 Jug Twitty

What the police investigation DID uncover is that the saintly image that Beth Holloway sold to the press about her daughter was false. When her daughter just disappeared Beth Holloway told to the press that her daughter was a virgin that led a saintly life that graduated with honors at High School  and that she got a scholarship to study medicine at a college. Later it turned out that she didn't graduate with honors, she didn't get any scholarship, she was sexually active, she smoked, she drunk, she used drugs, and that it wasn't the first time that she escaped from her home. After the Aruban police uncovered this lie; they found it necessary to investigate the family more thoroughly. But that wasn't going to be possible. The FBI wouldn't allow that. But why did the Aruban law enforcement let themselves being commanded by a foreign institution on their own territory? At that point; the investigation wasn't about Natalee anymore, it was about not endangering the Aruban economy and about the relation of The Netherlands with the United States. The Aruban police got trapped. Trapped between the imperial might of the US on the one side, the imperial might of their colonial masters on the other side, and the pressure of their own government above them. It is said by the Aruban police that there were even calls being made from The White House to the office of the Aruban Prime Minister. Aruba is part of the Kingdom of The Netherlands, which always have been a loyal lapdog of the USA. Because they didn't want problems with the Americans, the Dutch put pressure on the Aruban government to not upset the Americans. Out of that, 75% of the Aruban national income comes from tourism, especially from the USA, that's why it wasn't also in the interest of the Arubans to clash with the Americans. Some went even further, and they think that Natalee Holloway was murdered by American intelligence services to have an excuse to station American and Dutch security services and military on the island to use it as a base to attack Venezuela. The enmity between the Bush administration and the government of Hugo Chavez is good known. The US already tried to overthrow Chavez in 2002.  I doubt this theory for two reasons. We are now in 2013. Most of the Dutch and American security services that went to Aruba to supposedly look for Natalee Holloway have left already, and Venezuela has never been attacked. And the second reason is that if the Americans want to attack Venezuela they can do that easily from Colombia, where they have a strong presence, as the Chavist government always has feared.

Hugo Chavez

But why were the Americans so opposed to the fact that the Aruban Law Enforcement would investigate the Holloway-Twitty family? You would say, that there were reasons enough to investigate them, and actually in the US that's a routine procedure, to investigate the family in any disapparition or murder case. So what made this family so special? Let's look then at who they are. 

Natalee Holloway enjoying the good life...

It turns out that Jug Twitty is a money launderer for the international mafia and is also an arms dealer for the US government. He went to school together with Jossy Mansur. Who is Jossy Mansur? I'll tell you in a moment, but first the family. It turns also out that Natalee's former boyfriend was on the island at the time she disappeared, but that was never investigated, or probably the Americans also wouldn't allow it.

Jossy Mansur

Whoever says Aruba says Jossy Mansur. His family owns around 60% of the island. In 1999 Jossy Mansur and his brother Luis Mansur sued the Netherlands government before the United Nations Human Rights Committee for disseminating what the Aruban government termed a top secret report that claimed that the Mansurs were involved in organized crime. The report by the Dutch Internal Security Service draws a picture of security in Aruba and mentions that foreign services fighting crime in the region are almost unanimous in their opinion that the predominant image of the Aruban business community is one of joint services towards (laundering specialists of) regional drug cartels.

The report mentions the Mansurs by name and portrays them as criminals who were associated with criminal organizations involved in drugs trafficking, gun trafficking and laundering money obtained from criminal activities. Despite the fact that the report was classified as top secret it was leaked to the press and its contents became public. The suit was dismissed on procedural grounds for failure to exhaust Mansur's civil remedies in the Netherlands courts.
Paulus Van Der Sloot, father of Joran Van Der Sloot, was a prominent Aruban lawyer (studying to become a judge) involved in the “top secret report”. His level of participation or position in the report is not known. 
Of course, Mansur wanted revenge with van der Sloot. If Mansur had some involvement in the disappearance on Natalee is unclear, but from a very early stage in the investigation, Mansur started appearing together with Beth and her husband and started to appear also on American television, which presented him as highly reliable, but the Aruban people knew the truth about him. Mansur put together his own team of investigation, and published supposed leads in his newspaper Diario, leads that always lead to van der Sloot of course.

According to Dan Young and Kelly Castillo, two mediums that worked together with Beth Holloway in the first week of Natalee's disappearance, claim that Natalee did already escape from home a few times before, and this time she planned her escape in advance for not having to go back home. And that the reason for her escapes is that Jug Twitty was raping her repeatedly. They also claim that Natalee was pregnant when she disappeared, and that Jug Twitty was the father of the baby.

Dan Young and Kelly Castillo

As if her behavior wasn't strange enough already, after she divorced Jug in 2007, she started dating with John Ramsey, the father of Jon Benet Ramsey. The child beauty queen that appeared dead in 1996. The murder was never solved, but in conspiracy circles they suspect that she was murdered by her parents in a satanic ritual. It is also known that John Ramsey was involved in the Iran contra's affair and has ties with the Bush family. It is also suspected that he pimped out his daughter as a prostitute for the recreation of high officials in the American regime.

John Ramsey and his deceased daughter Jon Bennet Ramsey

So, after all this bizarre and preoccupying facts being exposed one question still remains. Where is Natalee Holloway? Did she escape fearing for her life? Was she murdered by her stepfather and her mother in some kind of ritual sacrifice? Did Jossy Mansur have something to do with it? Probably we'll never know.

But wait, don't go yet. The story isn't over yet. On Juni 2nd 2010 Stephany Flores was found dead in an hotel room, and Joran van der Sloot was suspected to be the murderer. 
But about that I'll tell you on the next post. Greetings!!

donderdag 21 november 2013


According to a story that is told in mystical Jewish circles Joseph Kennedy(JFK's father) returned to the US aboard an ocean liner that was also carrying Israel Jacobson, a poor rabbi, and six of his students who were fleeing the Nazis.
A notorious anti-Semite, Kennedy complained to the captain that the bearded Jews were upsetting the first class passengers by praying on the Jewish high holy day of Rosh Hashanah. In retaliation, Rabbi Jacobson put a curse on Kennedy, damning him and all his male descendants to tragic fates.

Source: The Kennedy Curse(2003)

Joseph Kennedy

donderdag 14 november 2013


The one who says that he never did it, is probably lying. To look something up on Wikipedia. We all did it or do it regularly. Wikipedia has been the internet phenomenon of the last years, comparable with Facebook or Twitter. It is now the fifth most visited website in the world according to www.ranking.com . And as of January 2010 was Wikipedia 2,2 billion dollars worth.

But what is actually Wikipedia? Who is behind it? Can you really rely on it for your information?
First let's look a little bit at Wikipedia's history.
Wikipedia is an internet encyclopedia. They claim that anyone can write new articles, or add information to existing ones. But the ones like myself, that ever tried to write something on Wikipedia know how far that is from the truth. Just try to write something on Wikipedia and you'll see how quick it is deleted for no clear and apparent reason. Even contradicting their own rules. Try then to protest the deletion to the editor and you'll get no answer or you'll get an answer that doesn't make much sense. Wikipedia claims to be democratically organized, but actually what the editor says is law. It is a closed club where it is almost impossible to get in if you don't share their Zionist mainstream views.
I know that by writing this article I throw away any chance I still may have to ever writing something on Wikipedia. But I don't care. My chances were slim anyway.

Wikipedia(back then Nupedia), was founded in March 2000 by two Jews, James Wales and Larry Sanger. Sanger was a computer programmer, and Wales was a pornographer.

 James Wales

In the begin, Sanger was the chief editor and Wales was the big boss.
Wales made a lot of money before the .com bubble burst with his company Bomis, a search engine for pornographic images. After Wikipedia's success any traces of Bomis mysteriously disappeared from Google and even from the Internet Archive. In later interviews  Wales denied that Bomis was pornographic, although the downloaded images that people still have from that time tell otherwise. 

Initially Nupedia had little success, until in 2001 Nupedia went over to a wiki system, and so Nupedia became Wikipedia. From this moment on Wikipedia's rise became meteoric. In 2002 Sanger left the company to take a job as university professor, so Wales alone was in command. By 2006 he was already one of the most powerful men on Earth, and Time Magazine named him that same year as one of the 100 most influential people in the world. He can destroy anyone's carreer and life by posting negative information on Wikipedia and leaving it there for years. That's why nobody dears to critizise him. When you google something, Wikipedia always come as the first result or one of the first ones. There seems to be a strange symbiosis between Wikipedia and Google. Google is another zionist internet company founded also by two Jews and it seems to be totally controlled by the CIA. But that's another question about which I promise I will tell to you some other time.

vrijdag 8 november 2013


Today I wanted to talk to you about a subject which is little known outside the US; but not for this less important. I'm talking to you about the disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa. This year in February it was the 100th anniversary of  his birth. That's why I wanted to talk to you about it. There are many theories about his disappearance. Some of them make little sense. But one theory in special calls the attention, and is that Jimmy Hoffa was involved or at least knew about the murder of JFK. According to this theory he was murdered to stop him from declaring at the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Hoffa would have been killed by a conjunction of the Mafia and US intelligence services. The Mafia may have had other reasons to murder him also, but this may have been the must important one.
In this article we'll also give some attention to the other theories, but we'll center mostly on the connection of the Hoffa disappearance with the JFK assassination, which I consider to be the most likely one and is also the most interesting one.

1. Hoffa in Brazil: Much like Elvis and Jesus, some conspiracy theorists believe Jimmy Hoffa didn’t die. Instead, rumor has it that Hoffa escaped the clutches of the law and rival mob factions by running off to Brazil with a go-go  dancer. If he was still alive, Hoffa would be 100 years old, so the odds of him being alive to this date are slim; however, it’s plausible that he lived for years after 1975.
Oddly enough, Hoffa was born in Brazil, Indiana, which could be evidence of conspiracy theorists confusing their geography and the cruel sense of irony that goes into picking the names of towns in Indiana.
2. Hoffa abducted by aliens: In 1977, Tom Dawson, a retired resident of Georgia, claimed he was abducted by aliens. During their requisite probing and prodding of Dawson, he claims he saw a bright light and a voice that called out “I am Jimmy Hoffa!” three times before being cut off. No further prove have ever been found about this theory.
3. Hoffa killed Robert Kennedy: Robert Kennedy, the attorney general who successfully sent Hoffa to jail, was assassinated in 1968 by Sirhan Sirhan the night after he defeated Senator McCarthy in the California primary. Conspiracy theorists speculate that Hoffa ordered the hit on Kennedy after working out a deal with Richard Nixon. Nixon later pardoned Hoffa and Hoffa allegedly donated half a million dollars to Nixon’s campaign.
Some theories even posit that Sirhan Sirhan had mob connections.  Despite the rumors, no complicity between Hoffa and Sirhan Sirhan has ever been found and, despite the rumor cropping up every year when the Hoffa disappearance rumors begin, no one has suggested a connection between this story and Hoffa’s demise.
4, Hoffa was in witness protection: Hoffa’s sudden disappearance in 1975 has led to numerous theories about his whereabouts, but none so enduring as the theory that he is holed away in federal witness protection, providing the FBI with a wealth of information about the Mafia.  If this is even remotely true, the FBI is staging an elaborate cover-up by constantly digging up Detroit looking for him.
Until here the minor conspiracy theories about Hoffa. Or at least the ones for which there is not a lot of proof. And now we come to the most interesting, fascinating and also the most likely theory. 
Was Hoffa involved in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy? Here the theories run wild. But before looking at how Hoffa was murdered, and must important of all, why he was murdered, we should look at who was Hoffa.

Jimmy Hoffa was born on February 14th 1913, in Brazil(Indiana). He was the child of a poor working family. His father was a Dutch mine-worker who died when he was only seven years old. His mother was a housewife. When his father died, he was old enough to understand that the cause of his dad's death had been caused by the bad working conditions in the mine. That is, that his father had been worked to death. That produced in him an aversion against the bosses and a determination not to end up like his father. In 1924 he moves with his family to Detroit. There he took a job loading and unloading trucks. A very hard job. Where he only got paid when he loaded or unloaded trucks. A job not much better than the one his father had at the mine. There the young Jimmy became an active trade-unionist. He rose to prominence when he led a strike in 1932. By 1940 he was chairman of the Central States Drivers Council, and two years later he was president of  the Michigan Conference of Teamsters, the most powerful transport trade-union in Michigan. There started his first mafia ties. 

In 1952 Hoffa became vice president of the Teamsters Union under Dave Beck, the president. Allegations were made in 1956 that the leadership of the union was involved in illegal activities. The Select Committee on Labor, that included Joe McCarthy, Barry Goldwater, Karl Mundt and John F. Kennedy, decided that these charges needed to be investigated.

Robert Kennedy, chief counsel of the committee, was instructed to collect information and discovered several financial irregularities. This included taking $85,119 between 1949 and 1953 from union funds to pay his own personal bill. The investigation also revealled that a Seattle builder had received $196,516 out of union funds to pay for work done on Beck's home. The investigations were televised and Kennedy's questioning turned him into a national political figure.

Beck was eventually imprisoned for five years and Hoffa became the new president of the Teamsters Union. Now Hoffa was effectively one of the most powerful men in the United States. One word from his mouth to call a strike could paralyze the US economy. At the age of 43, he had risen from a simple truck loader to one of the most powerful men in the US. That earned him the aversion of many rich and powerful people, who didn't like upstarts. Especially his mutual antipathy for the Kennedy's was good known.

Hoffa has been much criticized because of his mafia ties. But let's situate that in it's proper historical context. In the years that Hoffa became a prominent trade-unionist(during the Great Depression), security forces were literally shooting and murdering demonstrating and striking trade-unionists. What Hoffa needed was muscle to fight back, and the workers themselves alone didn't have that. Hoffa made a deal with the mob in which in exchange for the gangsters protecting the unions against the police and the hit-men of the bosses; Hoffa would give them loans from the truck drivers pension funds. 

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

If JFK was killed by the mafia, as the movie "JFK" suggests, and he probably was, then the mob didn't do it alone. It is very possible that they did it in collusion  with the CIA. The presence of Lee Harvey Oswald, a man who had trained in CIA camps very much indicates that. But Oswald was only a patsy set there to mislead. 

Lee Harvey Oswald

The mafia was fed up with Kennedy. After they helped him to become president, he launched a crackdown against the mob which was unprecedented in the history of the US. 
The mafia shared an objective with the CIA: to kill Fidel Castro. Early in 1961 the CIA convinced the young and inexperienced president that Castro could be overthrown through an invasion which would start at the Bay of Pigs.

Fidel Castro

 Of course the invasion failed. Kennedy was infuriated and said that he would break the CIA in a thousand pieces and blow it to the wind. Since then the relations of the president with the Agency weren't good. But, why would the CIA be interested  in killing the president? That's difficult to say. The Agency always had it's own agenda. There are also intelligence services in the US that are even more secretive than  the CIA and not even the president knows about what they are doing, or if they even exist. Some say that Kennedy wanted to make public the UFO files. Others say that he wanted to make peace with the Soviet Union. I don't know, but the question is that they killed him, or at least they ordered his murder or they killed him together with the mafia. 
Anyway, that's not what this article is about. I was going to talk to you about Hoffa's disappearance. I know that this month is the 50th anniversary of Kennedy's murder, but I promise you that I'll talk to you about Kennedy's murder some other time.
But Hoffa's disappearance has a lot to do with Kennedy's murder. Hoffa wasn't part of the mafia, but he had close ties with it. He also had good reasons to kill Kennedy. His enmity with the Kennedy brothers goes all the way back to 1956. When he was questioned in a really hard-handed manner by them. In the presidential election debate of 1960, John Kennedy said that he wasn't amused to see men as Hoffa at the head of national trade unions. When JFK became president, he named his brother Robert attorney general, who is said to have started an investigation unit with the sole purpose to get Hoffa behind bars. If that's true, it would mean that RFK suffered from tunnel vision. An attorney general should investigate facts, not people. 

 Robert Francis Kennedy

What is clear is that the mob was deeply involved in Kennedy's murder. There is no doubt that the mafia had the capacity to organize a hit like that. But they must have needed some covering for it, otherwise the consequences of it could have been enough as to destroy the mob for ever. And this covering was given to them by the Central Intelligence Agency.
According to Charles Crimaldi, a former mafia hit-man who was a Government informant, Hoffa was the go-between man between the mafia and the CIA.
The mafia had many businesses in Cuba before the revolution, mostly in the gambling industry. So they had the same interest in seeing Castro dead as the CIA.
There were different plots during the 60's of the mafia together with the CIA to kill him, but not one of them gave result. Some say that they did actually kill Castro and that the Cuban government put a double in his place, but I won't go into this now. Even if he was indeed killed, that doesn't change anything in our story. 
Jack Ruby, the murderer of Oswald, had ties with organized crime and with the CIA.

Jack Ruby

How could Ruby walk with a gun into security zone and shoot Oswald? Was there somebody that wasn't interested that Oswald would declare? If Oswald said that he was only a patsy, of who was he a patsy? Of the CIA? Of the mafia? Or of both?
In February 1964, a memo of the Warren Commission, related  Ruby to Barney Baker, a thug who was  working for Hoffa. The same memo listed the Teamsters on top of a list of organizations that may have been interested in killing Kennedy.
Of course, Hoffa knew that if John Kennedy died; his brother Robert would quit as attorney general. Two days after JFK was shot Hoffa told a reporter: "Bobby Kennedy is just another reporter now". 
Many conspiracy-theorists suggest that LBJ was also involved in Kennedy's murder. But I'll talk to you about this theory some other time.

 Lyndon Baines Johnson

In 1964 Jimmy Hoffa was sentenced to fifteen years in prison for jury tampering. Frank Fitzsimmons became president of the Teamsters. Initially the understanding was that Hoffa would continue leading the Teamsters from the jail and that Fitzsimmons would only be a figure-head, but soon after Hoffa was jailed, a power struggle ensued. Fitzsimmons was more malleable to mafia interests. Under Hoffa the mafia had access to Teamsters funds, but Hoffa continued being the boss. With Fitzsimmons the Teamsters were totally controlled by the mafia. Under these conditions, it isn't surprising that the mafia didn't want Hoffa back in power. And so the Teamsters divided in two factions a Hoffa faction and a Fitzsimmons faction. In the presidential election of 1968, the Hoffa faction supported the republican candidate Richard Nixon, meanwhile the Fitzsimmons faction supported the democrat Hubert Humphrey with the rest of the labor movement.

 Frank Fitzsimmons

The Hoffa camp made a contribution to the Nixon campaign, so it isn't surprising that Nixon freed Hoffa in 1971, but with the condition that he would not lead any trade-union until 1980.
From the time he was freed, until he disappeared, Hoffa was fighting to return to the leadership of the Teamsters.

 Richard Nixon

Three weeks before Hoffa disappeared, Richard Fitzsimmons was victim of a terrorist attack. Fitzsimmons was not hurt. Allegedly the attack was carried out by Hoffa supporters. Immediately Fitzsimmons cracked down on Hoffa's followers. Or maybe Fitzsimmons planned the attack himself to have an excuse to crush dissent inside the Teamsters. Or even better, his mafia manipulators did it to set up the stage for Hoffa's disappearance.
As for the disappearance of Hoffa itself we know who ordered the hit: Russell Bufalino, a Pennsylvanian mobster. Hoffa had an appointment  with a still unknown mobster at a restaurant called the Red Fox. 

 The Red Fox restaurant, the place where Hoffa was seen for the last time.

Supposedly, Charles O'Brien, a man who Hoffa trusted, picked him up at the restaurant and took him to the house where O'Brien was staying. Hoffa would never get out of that house alive. Some time later Ralph Picardo, a government informer told investigators that after Hoffa was killed, he was stuffed into a 55-gallon oil drum and was taken on a Gateway Transportation truck to an unknown destination. But about the location of Hoffa's body, there are as many conspiracy theories than about his murder. From being buried under the Giants Stadium in New Jersey to being made into hot dogs. To this day the feds are still looking for his body.

But OK, why was Hoffa killed? Was it the result of a power struggle inside the Teamsters? Not very likely. When he disappeared he had very little chances left to get back the leadership of the Teamsters. Probably he was murdered to stop him from testifying in front of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. And that makes a lot of sense. In 1982 he was officially declared dead. 

But one thing is sure. Almost forty years after he disappeared, James Riddle Hoffa continues being just what his name says: a riddle.

vrijdag 1 november 2013


Madeleine McCann is being held captive on the personal and private orders of José Manuel Durão Barroso.

A seemingly decisive breakthrough in the case of Madeleine McCann was made in September 2008 with new revelations published by the English investigative reporter, Christopher Story. Following the receipt of several death-threats, in particular one at lunchtime on Thursday 18th September 2008, Story released details and named names.

Behind the abduction of four-year-old Madeleine McCann from the Ocean Club Resort, Praia da Luz, Portugal, on Thursday 3rd May 2007, was a shadowy German organisation called the Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) and the Portuguese politician José Manuel Durão Barroso, the 12th President of the European Commission.

According to Christopher Story, the DVD, based at Dachau, near Munich, has been extensively involved in paedophile child abduction operations for many years, both in Europe and abroad. Selected children are kidnapped, degraded for perverse purposes, filmed and murdered in the production of snuff movies for the international child pornography trade. Senior politicians in several countries are clients and agents of the DVD.

It was reported on Thursday 7th August 2008 that the Metropolitan Police (London) confirmed in an email that Madeleine McCann was abducted on the orders of a paedophile organisation based in Belgium and controlled by the DVD for the European Commission. The DVD's procedure is that an adult client is sent three photographs of children and chooses one of them. The selected victim is then abducted to meet the client's sexual requirements. After a photographer had taken pictures of various children at the Ocean Club Resort, Praia da Luz, three pictures were given to José Manuel Durão Barroso. He chose Madeleine McCann, an English girl from Rothley in Leicestershire.

José Manuel Durao Barroso (54) was born in Lisbon on the 23rd March 1956. He is married to Margarida Sousa Uva. The couple have three children: Luís, Guilherme and Francisco. Barroso was in office as the 117th Prime Minister of Portugal from the 6th April 2002 to the 17th July 2004. He actively supported the war in Iraq and provided the venue for talks between US President George Bush Jnr and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in the Portuguese Azores on the eve of the conflict.The current position is that the DVD is refusing to release Madeleine McCann in order to protect Barroso and certain others among its well-known agents and clients.
One of the DVD's bases in Germany is located to the right of the railway line that runs through Unterweilbach, Prittlbach and Hebertshausen into Dachau. It is adjacent to the Hebertshausen Bahnhof in an empty area ending in a very steep bank, against which 8,000 Soviet prisoners of war were shot dead in cold blood during the Second World War. Set into the bank is an odd-looking building with a security gate approached by a path. Beyond this gated entrance is a doorway. Inside the doorway, investigators have photographed evidence of recently used black magic paraphernalia.

The Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), is the secretive pan-German Nazi Strategic Continuum. Over the years, German DVD agents have included President George Bush Snr, The Right Honourable Sir Edward Heath KG MBE (President of The Oxford Union 1938; British Prime Minister 1970-74) and Baron Jenkins of Hillhead (Roy Harris Jenkins, British Chancellor of the Exchequer 1967-1970; British Home Secretary 1974-1976; The Sixth President of the European Commission 1977-1981; Chancellor of the University of Oxford 1987-2003).

Current DVD assets are understood to include the Obama White House, Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister from 1977-2007, Sir John Scarlett KCMG OBE, head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6 GO-2 (London) from May 2004 until November 2009, and several of the senior people at the US Office of Naval Intelligence (Washington).

It is said that many of the high-status British agents of the German DVD were recruited by the Hugh Trevor-Roper DVD cell at Oxford University. Trevor-Roper (Baron Dacre of Glanton) was a prominent English modern historian specialising in the Nazi period.

It has emerged recently that Trevor-Roper worked as a double agent for the German Abwehr. He was active at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremburg (1945-1949) providing obfuscation and false histories to enable the covert escape of senior Nazi operatives and scientists, including Adolph Hitler, from Germany in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. The escaping Nazis were secreted into the American military-industrial complex or into American controlled locations in South America and Antarctica.

The Trevor-Roper DVD cell at Oxford is also said to have recruited, or manufactured leverage upon, several American Rhodes Scholars at Oxford University, including President Bill Clinton and David Evan Kendall. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar at University College, Oxford, in 1968, at the time when Trevor-Roper was Regius Professor of History. Kendall was Clinton's personal lawyer during the Lewinsky scandal and subsequent Senate impeachment trial in 1998. He was a Rhodes Scholar at Worcester College, Oxford, in 1966.

Exploiting his privileged position as a director of The Times newspaper (London), Trevor-Roper was centrally involved in the DVD disinformation fiasco connected with the 'Hitler Diaries' hoax of 1983.

Tony Blair was at St John's College, Oxford, from 1974-1976. Later in life he became a close protégé of Roy Jenkins. MI6's John Scarlett was at Magdalene College, Oxford, from 1968-1971, and was awarded a first class degree in History.

maandag 28 oktober 2013


9/11 is a day that will live in infamy, but not because of the attacks on the US that killed over 3,000 people. It is less well known is that September 11th is the anniversary of the overthrow of the elected government of Salvador Allende by general Augusto Pinochet’s CIA-backed forces in Chile. The coup in Chile led to a bloody US-sponsored dictatorship that lasted from 1973 until, roughly, 1990. Like the Pinochet period, the post-Pinochet period is characterized by comprador politics. However, comprador rule in Chile today is not as heavy handed, crass and overt as it was under Pinochet. Certainly more people died at the hands of Pinochet, as a result of US policy in Chile, than died in the attacks against the US in 2001. Certainly more died at the hands of the brutal military and police dictatorship, died at the hands of death squads, and died by the structural violence of capitalism-imperialism than died in the New York attacks. Yet Americans get teary eyed over the latter, not the former. America’s reaction to 9/11, once again reflects that Americans, generally speaking, do not value the lives of people in the Third World. The coup in Chile was just one more crime in a century of crimes perpetuated against the peoples of Latin America and the Third World by the US. The death toll of US imperialism runs into the billions. By comparison, the few thousand who died in the 2001 attacks are a drop in the ocean.
Even though the government of Salvador Allende leaned toward the Soviet Union, having pro-Soviet regimes in Latin America was preferable to the traditional domination by Western imperialism, especially US imperialism. In addition, some of the Soviet-leaning forces in Latin America had a popular and progressive character. Since Europe destroyed itself in World War 2, Europe could no longer hold onto its colonies in the Third World. The US largely took over the management of Europe’s colonies. Thus the old European colonialism was replaced by US neocolonialism. The US reached such imperial heights that nearly the entire US population, including the US working class, became exploiters of the Third World. For almost all of the post-World War 2 period, overall Soviet strength never really matched US strength.